THREE ESSAYS ON THE MEANING OF LIFE

 

INTRODUCTION

 

You cannot swim for new horizons until you have the courage to lose sight of the shore.

-       William Faulkner

 

Too much of humanity is presently swimming in a sea of meaninglessness – evidenced by the growing numbers of us with drug and alcohol problems – and that too many of us are drowning in said sea, is evidenced by our ever-increasing rates of suicide.

Humanity finds itself in this predicament because the sea in which we are swimming is bounded by two hostile shores, neither of which allow safe landing for any seeking some credible meaning to our existence. I speak of the shores of the opposing lands of belief and disbelief – one hosting the House of God and the other hosting the House of Disbelief.

The House of God is hostile to life having any credible meaning because it is home to an incredible god (the male, Abrahamic god of the ancient Hebrews) and home to an equally incredible meaning and purpose of life (a once-only test for an eternity in either heaven or hell). The House of Disbelief, on the other hand, denies outright the existence of any God or any special meaning or purpose to life – holding that we exist in an accidental, Godless universe – where we can only construct our own personal meanings, and/or only have the survival and genetic purposes of our animal bodies.

Before too many more of us drown in our steadily deepening sea of meaninglessness, perhaps it is time to take Faulkner’s above courage and “swim for new horizons” – beyond sight of our present hopeless shores? This work of three essays and a conclusion will attempt just that. The first essay examines the House of God, and the second the House of Disbelief – to find out why so many of us find both hostile to any credible meaning and purpose to our life – then the third essay attempts to swim beyond sight of their discouraging shores for new horizons, hopefully belonging to a land more hospitable to credible meaning and purpose.

Those who feel they are close to drowning should skip the essays and paddle straight to the conclusion wherein they may find some hope. If unconvinced, then they are sentenced to read the essays which contain arguments from evidence for that conclusion.

Enjoy?